Digitisation Call 2010

Three projects have been selected under the 2010 call.

Digitisation of AVES bird observation records anterior to 1990

Jean-Yves Paquet, Marc de Sloover (Aves-Natagora)

The purpose of the project is to digitise a significant part of ornithological data gathered by Aves between 1960 and 1990. These observation data are currently stored on hand-written record cards that were filled in by experienced ornithologists from monthly record forms sent by hundreds of field birdwatchers. Together with the current observation database, pre-1990 digitised bird observation data will allow for study of change in bird phenology, distribution and abundance during a 50-year period. An estimated 60 000 of about 200 000 existing records are expected to be digitised during the present project. The data reliability and quality will be of the highest standard possible, thanks to careful record validation operated back when they were collected and the original web-assisted procedure of the digitisation process that will be developed at the start of the project.

Back to top

Inventory of the Belgian bark beetles (Scolytidae), powder beetles (Lyctidae) and their associated saproxylic beetle fauna

Dr Patrick Grootaert (Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences)

Saproxylic beetles form an important part of forest biodiversity. Since many years there is a great interest in saproxylophagous/xylobiont insects from various stakeholders. Traditionally, engineers in forest management are interested in the species causing damage to standing wood, which is caused in Belgium primarily by bark beetles(Scolytidae) (Drumont et al., 1991; Warzée & Grégoire, 2003). They want distribution maps of pest species and see changes of dispersal if any.

Forest engineers are interested to learn of dangerous invasive species, and of potential predatory species that may be able to control damaging insects. On the other hand many xylobiont species are not harmful at all and prefer to live in dead and decaying wood. Their presence is often an indication of maturity and quality of a forest. Incidentally, many of these rare species belong to the same taxonomic groups(families) of species predating on bark beetles.

Hence there is a demand for information from both forest management as well as nature conservation for more information about bark beetles and their associated fauna. Many of these species are very rare in Belgian forests due to overexploitation of wood. Recent distribution changes have been observed for several species, by natural means or as a result of human transport.

In Belgium, there are no recent and complete catalogues or distribution atlases for most of the saproxylic and xylobiont beetle families, which poses a problem handling questions concerning biodiversity conservation, forest health, or dealing with invasive species.

Back to top

Digitisation of IFBL flora checklists for Belgium (1939-1971) II

Dr. Leo Vanhecke (Meise, National Botanic Garden of Belgium)

The project aims at the continuation of the former digitisation project of Belgian IFBL checklists from the period 1939-1971. An equivalent number of IFBL 1 km² flora checklists sampled between 1939 and 1971 will be digitalised (about 2000 original lists, or 1/5 of the approx. 10 000 available lists). This amount of lists corresponds with some 200 000 data representative of the former distribution of vascular plant species in Belgium. The digitisation of yet another part of existing checklists in Belgium is on its own already a meaningful objective, especially in relation to the realisation of a new atlas for the distribution of plants in the Walloon region. As it was the case for the first project, we will try to realise a project that can also standalone. Therefore we will adapt the selection procedure for the lists to be digitised. This procedure, based on the quality of the individual lists and on maximising the spatial dispersion of the data throughout Belgium, remains essentially the same, but it will be the second best list (instead of the best lists in the first project) that will be selected. The results will be compared to the results of the first project (best lists versus second best lists) and the whole set of both projects will be integrated. The digitised data will be placed on one or more websites, at the disposal of scientists, policy makers, and any other interested people.

They will be integrated in existing national and regional flora databases and will contribute to the realisation of the regional Flora Atlases. The analysis of the digitised data will improve our possibilities to compare floral data over successive periods and will be of help in developing a strategy for reducing the costs and the length of new flora monitoring and mapping projects in the future.

Back to top